[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba5aa2939e81f730396d41120aa603df7999d937.camel@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 22:47:15 +1200
From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Wander Lairson Costa <wander@...hat.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>,
marcelo.cerri@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
khalid.elmously@...onical.com, philip.cox@...onical.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] x86/mm: Make tdx_enc_status_changed() vmalloc
address compatible
On Mon, 2022-05-23 at 21:05 -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> set_memory_*crypted() APIs are used to change encryption or decryption
> page attributes for the given address. It also by default support the
> conversion for the vmalloc'ed memory address.
>
> In TDX Guest, tdx_enc_status_changed() function is triggered by
> set_memory_*crypted() APIs when converting memory from/to shared or
> private. Internally this function uses __pa() for physical address
> conversion, which breaks the vmalloc address compatibility of the
> set_memory_*crypted() APIs.
>
> So add support to fix the vmalloc'ed address compatibility issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> index b49211994864..37d58675ccf1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <asm/idtentry.h>
> #include <asm/irq_regs.h>
> #include <asm/desc.h>
> +#include <asm/io.h>
>
> /* TDX module Call Leaf IDs */
> #define TDX_GET_INFO 1
> @@ -680,8 +681,14 @@ static bool try_accept_one(phys_addr_t *start, unsigned long len,
> */
> static bool tdx_enc_status_changed(unsigned long vaddr, int numpages, bool enc)
> {
> - phys_addr_t start = __pa(vaddr);
> - phys_addr_t end = __pa(vaddr + numpages * PAGE_SIZE);
> + phys_addr_t start, end;
> +
> + if (is_vmalloc_addr((void *)vaddr))
> + start = vmalloc_to_pfn((void *) vaddr) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + else
> + start = __pa(vaddr);
> +
> + end = start + numpages * PAGE_SIZE;
>
> if (!enc) {
> /* Set the shared (decrypted) bits: */
AMD uses lookup_address() which doesn't require the vaddr being vmap() address.
Shouldn't TDX use the same way?
--
Thanks,
-Kai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists