lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7d6fec7-039d-2f54-c3b3-95deb7417a73@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 May 2022 10:55:20 +0800
From:   Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/swapfile: avoid confusing swap cache statistics

On 2022/5/31 7:04, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2022 17:26:25 +0800 Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
>> At swapoff time, we're going to swap in the pages continuously. So calling
>> lookup_swap_cache would confuse statistics. We should use find_get_page
>> directly here.
> 
> Why is the existing behaviour wrong?  swapoff() has to swap stuff in to
> be able to release the swap device.  Why do you believe that this
> swapin activity should not be accounted?

IMHO, statistics, e.g. swap_cache_info.find_success, are used to show the effectiveness
of the swap cache activity. So they should only reflect the memory accessing activity
of the user. I think swapoff can't reflect the effectiveness of the swap cache activity
because it just swaps in pages one by one. Or statistics should reflect all the activity
of the user including swapoff?

Thanks!

> 
> 
> .
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ