[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YpWE11ZI5MyyhtlD@olivier-3493erg>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 05:00:39 +0200
From: Olivier dautricourt <olivierdautricourt@...il.com>
To: Nam Cao <namcaov@...il.com>
Cc: vkoul@...nel.org, sr@...x.de, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: altera-msgdma: correct mutex locking order
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 08:23:06PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> The order of spin_unlock and spin_lock seems wrong. Correct it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcaov@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Get rid of dirty index problem due to the patch being manually editted.
>
> drivers/dma/altera-msgdma.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/altera-msgdma.c b/drivers/dma/altera-msgdma.c
> index 6f56dfd375e3..e35096c12abc 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/altera-msgdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/altera-msgdma.c
> @@ -591,9 +591,9 @@ static void msgdma_chan_desc_cleanup(struct msgdma_device *mdev)
>
> dmaengine_desc_get_callback(&desc->async_tx, &cb);
> if (dmaengine_desc_callback_valid(&cb)) {
> - spin_unlock(&mdev->lock);
> - dmaengine_desc_callback_invoke(&cb, NULL);
> spin_lock(&mdev->lock);
> + dmaengine_desc_callback_invoke(&cb, NULL);
> + spin_unlock(&mdev->lock);
> }
>
> /* Run any dependencies, then free the descriptor */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Hello,
the lock is first grabbed in msgdma_tasklet.
Kr,
Olivier
Powered by blists - more mailing lists