linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] MT8192 pinctrl properties adjustments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 31 May 2022 17:19:21 -0400
From:   Nícolas F. R. A. Prado 
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] MT8192 pinctrl properties adjustments

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:34:19AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 25/05/22 17:57, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> > 
> > The two patches in this series substitute properties in the mt8192
> > pinctrl dt-binding for ones which have a clearer meaning and are more
> > standardized. At this point there's no DT using the mt8192 pinctrl
> > binding, so if such changes are to be made, they need to happen now.
> > 
> > 
> > Nícolas F. R. A. Prado (2):
> >    dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8192: Add drive-strength-microamp
> >    dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8192: Use generic bias instead of pull-*-adv
> > 
> >   .../bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8192.yaml      | 58 ++++++-------------
> >   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> Hey Nic,
> 
> As you know, I definitely agree with these changes, but they don't deserve
> to get any Fixes tag: backporting should be useless in this case... and you
> anyway aren't fixing a faulty binding.

Alright, I was on the fence on this one, but I can drop the tags for v2.

Thanks,
Nícolas

> 
> Cheers!
> Angelo