lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCDf4UfEPFV4_Qf3m16DE-NzNUk_ZVcHZhgxVvn_pokdgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 May 2022 23:47:50 +0200
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] iio: adc: meson_saradc: Use temporary variable for
 struct device

Hi Andy,

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:18 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
[...]
> @@ -650,11 +648,12 @@ static int meson_sar_adc_clk_init(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>                                   void __iomem *base)
>  {
>         struct meson_sar_adc_priv *priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +       struct device *idev = &indio_dev->dev;
> +       struct device *dev = dev->parent;
It looks like this should read:
    struct device *dev = idev->parent;

That said, I think this kind of typo is very easy with the current
naming schema.
It's been a while since I looked at other drivers but maybe the IIO
maintainers have some recommendations for us (which would apply to
multiple IIO drivers, not just meson_saradc).
For example: I am not sure if iio_{err,warn} functions (which take a
struct iio_dev pointer) have been proposed/discussed before. I think
they could be useful for other drivers as well.


Best regards,
Martin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ