lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdezsaTyhJxhun+HG8M=q9cOQJKvNSOdcv90fXcn2mu-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Jun 2022 17:48:08 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] gpio: crystalcove: make irq_chip immutable

On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 5:04 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

...

> +       gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq);

I think we do not need to do this for pins that we do not touch as
IRQs (they are vGPIOs with GPE capabilities, AFAIR).

> -       if (data->hwirq < CRYSTALCOVE_GPIO_NUM) {
> +       if (hwirq < CRYSTALCOVE_GPIO_NUM) {
>                 cg->set_irq_mask = false;
>                 cg->update |= UPDATE_IRQ_MASK;
>         }

...

> -       if (data->hwirq < CRYSTALCOVE_GPIO_NUM) {
> +       if (hwirq < CRYSTALCOVE_GPIO_NUM) {
>                 cg->set_irq_mask = true;
>                 cg->update |= UPDATE_IRQ_MASK;
>         }
> +
> +       gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq);

Ditto.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ