[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vdei4SyC0Ph0xB3DFLgkixU2FJ1TS4og8r=b+CkiMQ5hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 12:01:12 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Joe Simmons-Talbott <joetalbott@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: Use octal permissions and DEVICE_ATTR_{RO,RW}.
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 9:40 PM Joe Simmons-Talbott
<joetalbott@...il.com> wrote:
>
> As reported by checkpatch.pl. Where possible use DEVICE_ATTR_RO and
DEVICE_ATTR_RO()
> DEVICE_ATTR_RW. Change function names to be <var>_show() for read and
DEVICE_ATTR_RW()
> <var>_store() for write.
...
> static struct device_attribute dev_attr_length_ro = __ATTR(length,
> + 0444, length_show, NULL);
> static struct device_attribute dev_attr_watermark_ro = __ATTR(watermark,
> + 0444, watermark_show, NULL);
Why not __ATTR_RO() here?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists