[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220602104703.c5af5abde1d9b867d6aed9c7@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 10:47:03 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NVDIMM <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jane Chu <jane.chu@...cle.com>,
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@...e.de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linmiaohe@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSETS] v14 fsdax-rmap + v11 fsdax-reflink
On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 10:18:09 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:42:13PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there any other work I should do with these two patchsets? I think they
> > are good for now. So... since the 5.19-rc1 is coming, could the
> > notify_failure() part be merged as your plan?
>
> Hmm. I don't see any of the patches 1-5,7-13 in current upstream, so
> I'm guessing this means Andrew isn't taking it for 5.19?
Sorry, the volume of commentary led me to believe that it wasn't
considered finalized. Shall take a look now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists