[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ifhxy-b50TyJdmzkJ_rnYyn7euzRc4-2bG_oxu-juCtw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 20:40:23 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kernel/reboot: Use static handler for register_platform_power_off()
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 12:11 AM Dmitry Osipenko
<dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> The register_platform_power_off() fails on m68k platform due to the
> memory allocation error that happens at a very early boot time when
> memory allocator isn't available yet. Fix it by using a static sys-off
> handler for the platform-level power-off handlers.
>
> Fixes: f0f7e5265b3b ("m68k: Switch to new sys-off handler API")
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
> ---
> kernel/reboot.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/reboot.c b/kernel/reboot.c
> index a091145ee710..3b19b123efec 100644
> --- a/kernel/reboot.c
> +++ b/kernel/reboot.c
> @@ -315,6 +315,37 @@ static int sys_off_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> return handler->sys_off_cb(&data);
> }
>
> +static struct sys_off_handler platform_sys_off_handler;
> +
> +static struct sys_off_handler *alloc_sys_off_handler(int priority)
> +{
> + struct sys_off_handler *handler;
> +
> + /*
> + * Platforms like m68k can't allocate sys_off handler dynamically
> + * at the early boot time because memory allocator isn't available yet.
> + */
> + if (priority == SYS_OFF_PRIO_PLATFORM) {
> + handler = &platform_sys_off_handler;
> + if (handler->cb_data)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> + } else {
> + handler = kzalloc(sizeof(*handler), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!handler)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + }
> +
> + return handler;
> +}
> +
> +static void free_sys_off_handler(struct sys_off_handler *handler)
> +{
> + if (handler == &platform_sys_off_handler)
> + memset(handler, 0, sizeof(*handler));
> + else
> + kfree(handler);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * register_sys_off_handler - Register sys-off handler
> * @mode: Sys-off mode
> @@ -345,9 +376,9 @@ register_sys_off_handler(enum sys_off_mode mode,
> struct sys_off_handler *handler;
> int err;
>
> - handler = kzalloc(sizeof(*handler), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!handler)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + handler = alloc_sys_off_handler(priority);
> + if (IS_ERR(handler))
> + return handler;
>
> switch (mode) {
> case SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF_PREPARE:
> @@ -364,7 +395,7 @@ register_sys_off_handler(enum sys_off_mode mode,
> break;
>
> default:
> - kfree(handler);
> + free_sys_off_handler(handler);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> @@ -391,7 +422,7 @@ register_sys_off_handler(enum sys_off_mode mode,
> }
>
> if (err) {
> - kfree(handler);
> + free_sys_off_handler(handler);
> return ERR_PTR(err);
> }
>
> @@ -422,7 +453,7 @@ void unregister_sys_off_handler(struct sys_off_handler *handler)
> /* sanity check, shall never happen */
> WARN_ON(err);
>
> - kfree(handler);
> + free_sys_off_handler(handler);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_sys_off_handler);
>
> --
Applied now (with the tags from Geert), but if there are any more
followup changes in that area, can you please CC them to linux-pm, so
people who have seen your original series can see them too?
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists