[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220602114132.f6e5675b2d2a4085b9b1e8c4@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 11:41:32 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] mm: shrinkers: add scan interface for shrinker
debugfs
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 17:56:22 -0700 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > > + ssize_t ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, read_len))
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > + kbuf[read_len] = '\0';
> > > +
> > > + if (sscanf(kbuf, "%lu %d %lu", &ino, &nid, &nr_to_scan) < 2)
> >
> > Was it intentional to permit more than three args?
>
> Good catch! No, of course it wasn't intentional.
>
> Below is an updated version of this patch.
>
> ...
>
> + if (sscanf(kbuf, "%lu %d %lu", &ino, &nid, &nr_to_scan) != 2)
> + return -EINVAL;
s/2/3/methinks?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists