lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7d5e291-da6b-7634-efde-b0c745bef8e2@oracle.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Jun 2022 23:03:52 +0400
From:   Denis Efremov <denis.e.efremov@...cle.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        theflamefire89@...il.com, Martin Faltesek <mfaltesek@...omium.org>,
        krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Jordy Zomer <jordy@...ing.systems>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [External] : Re: [PATCH 4.19 01/20] nfc: st21nfca: Fix potential
 buffer overflows in EVT_TRANSACTION



On 6/2/22 20:30, Denis Efremov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 6/2/22 20:12, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>> commit 4fbcc1a4cb20fe26ad0225679c536c80f1648221 upstream.
>>>
>>> It appears that there are some buffer overflows in EVT_TRANSACTION.
>>> This happens because the length parameters that are passed to memcpy
>>> come directly from skb->data and are not guarded in any way.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jordy Zomer <jordy@...ing.systems>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>>> Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <denis.e.efremov@...cle.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>>
>> It seems that this patch causes an memory leak, transaction does not
>> seem to be freed in the error paths.
>>
>> (I also wonder if the skb should be freed in the error paths...?)
>>
>> Reported-by: <theflamefire89@...il.com>
> 
> Same for upstream code and it looks like the problem existed even
> before this patch. I'll prepare an upstream patch and cc it to stable.
> 

I checked and Martin already sent patches upstream to fix this.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220401180939.2025819-1-mfaltesek@google.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220401180955.2025877-1-mfaltesek@google.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220401181032.2026076-1-mfaltesek@google.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220401181048.2026145-1-mfaltesek@google.com/

Thanks,
Denis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ