[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ffc76fe-f25e-c9e2-8b0a-6548525d3150@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:50:12 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, rrichter@....com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, like.xu.linux@...il.com,
x86@...nel.org,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>, ananth.narayan@....com,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>, santosh.shukla@....com,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] perf headers: Store pmu caps in an array of
strings
Hi Namhyung,
On 03-Jun-22 3:07 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 8:28 PM Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com> wrote:
>>
>> Currently all capabilities are stored in a single string separated
>> by NULL character. Instead, store them in an array which makes
>> searching of capability easier.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
>> ---
> [SNIP]
>> @@ -3231,12 +3226,16 @@ static int process_per_cpu_pmu_caps(struct feat_fd *ff, int *nr_cpu_pmu_caps,
>> if (!value)
>> goto free_name;
>>
>> - if (strbuf_addf(&sb, "%s=%s", name, value) < 0)
>> + name_size = strlen(name);
>> + value_size = strlen(value);
>> + ptr = zalloc(sizeof(char) * (name_size + value_size + 2));
>> + if (!ptr)
>> goto free_value;
>>
>> - /* include a NULL character at the end */
>> - if (strbuf_add(&sb, "", 1) < 0)
>> - goto free_value;
>> + memcpy(ptr, name, name_size);
>> + ptr[name_size] = '=';
>> + memcpy(ptr + name_size + 1, value, value_size);
>
> What about using asprintf() instead?
Yeah asprintf() would make that code bit simpler. I think I'll have to
respin the series :)
Thanks,
Ravi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists