[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7758ed1-5dcb-80dd-092a-a6bb21c3997d@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 08:55:39 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec
On 5/30/22 01:40, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> Borislav,
>
> I don't think there are any outstanding review comments for me to deal
> with on this, so is it safe to assume it'll get picked up at some point
> once the merge window calms down?
Nothing here looks too crazy, but it's still been _very_ lightly
reviewed. It doesn't seem like anyone from the kexec world has seen it,
for instance.
Mimi's review was a great start, but it would be really nice to make
sure that the kexec bits look good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists