linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yp16e5hMphomr2+H@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date:   Mon, 6 Jun 2022 11:54:35 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec

On 06/03/22 at 08:55am, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 5/30/22 01:40, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > Borislav,
> > 
> > I don't think there are any outstanding review comments for me to deal
> > with on this, so is it safe to assume it'll get picked up at some point
> > once the merge window calms down?
> 
> Nothing here looks too crazy, but it's still been _very_ lightly
> reviewed.  It doesn't seem like anyone from the kexec world has seen it,
> for instance.
> 
> Mimi's review was a great start, but it would be really nice to make
> sure that the kexec bits look good.

The change looks good from kexec/kdump side. Not sure if Eric has
any concern.