linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/1] drm/radeon: Initialize fences array entries in radeon_sa_bo_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220607151933.32850-1-xiaohuizhang@ruc.edu.cn>
Date:   Tue,  7 Jun 2022 23:19:33 +0800
From:   Xiaohui Zhang <xiaohuizhang@....edu.cn>
To:     Xiaohui Zhang <xiaohuizhang@....edu.cn>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        christian.koenig@....com, Xinhui.Pan@....com,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] drm/radeon: Initialize fences array entries in radeon_sa_bo_next_hole

Similar to the handling of amdgpu_sa_bo_next_hole in commit 6a15f3ff19a8
("drm/amdgpu: Initialize fences array entries in amdgpu_sa_bo_next_hole"),
we thought a patch might be needed here as well.

The entries were only initialized once in radeon_sa_bo_new. If a fence
wasn't signalled yet in the first radeon_sa_bo_next_hole call, but then
got signalled before a later radeon_sa_bo_next_hole call, it could
destroy the fence but leave its pointer in the array, resulting in
use-after-free in radeon_sa_bo_new.

Signed-off-by: Xiaohui Zhang <xiaohuizhang@....edu.cn>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
index 310c322c7112..0981948bd9ed 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c
@@ -267,6 +267,8 @@ static bool radeon_sa_bo_next_hole(struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_manager,
 	for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i) {
 		struct radeon_sa_bo *sa_bo;
 
+		fences[i] = NULL;
+
 		if (list_empty(&sa_manager->flist[i])) {
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -332,10 +334,8 @@ int radeon_sa_bo_new(struct radeon_device *rdev,
 
 	spin_lock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
 	do {
-		for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i) {
-			fences[i] = NULL;
+		for (i = 0; i < RADEON_NUM_RINGS; ++i)
 			tries[i] = 0;
-		}
 
 		do {
 			radeon_sa_bo_try_free(sa_manager);
-- 
2.17.1