linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] can: refactoring of can-dev module and of Kbuild

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:49:29 +0900
From:   Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        linux-can <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Max Staudt <max@...as.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] can: refactoring of can-dev module and of Kbuild

On Tue. 7 Jun. 2022 at 16:13, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> On 07.06.2022 11:49:30, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
> [...]
> > So I think that the diagram is correct. Maybe rephrasing the cover
> > letter as below would address your concerns?
>
> BTW: I got the OK from Jakub to send PR with merges.
>
> If you think the cover letter needs rephrasing, send a new series and
> I'm going to force push that over can-next/master. After that let's
> consider can-next/master as fast-forward only.

I will first wait for Oliver’s feedback. Once we are aligned, I can do
the v6 and I really hope that would be the last one.