[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220607101807.249965-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 18:18:07 +0800
From: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/deadline: Use proc_douintvec_minmax() limit minimum value
sysctl_sched_dl_period_max and sysctl_sched_dl_period_min are unsigned
integer, but proc_dointvec() wouldn't return error even if we set a
negative number.
Use proc_douintvec_minmax() instead of proc_dointvec(). Add extra1 for
sysctl_sched_dl_period_max and extra2 for sysctl_sched_dl_period_min.
It's just an optimization for match data and proc_handler in struct
ctl_table. The 'if (period < min || period > max)' in __checkparam_dl()
will work fine even if there hasn't this patch.
v2:
- update the log message.
Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index b5152961b743..5867e186c39a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -30,14 +30,16 @@ static struct ctl_table sched_dl_sysctls[] = {
.data = &sysctl_sched_dl_period_max,
.maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
.mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
+ .proc_handler = proc_douintvec_minmax,
+ .extra1 = (void *)&sysctl_sched_dl_period_min,
},
{
.procname = "sched_deadline_period_min_us",
.data = &sysctl_sched_dl_period_min,
.maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
.mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
+ .proc_handler = proc_douintvec_minmax,
+ .extra2 = (void *)&sysctl_sched_dl_period_max,
},
{}
};
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists