[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a86afcd38ce4243f86fddd1647129d64585e56d1.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:31:21 +0800
From: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@...com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, "Helge Deller" <deller@....de>,
CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Jitao shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
CC: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/21] dt-bindings: mediatek,dpi: Add DPINTF
compatible
On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 13:55 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 23/05/22 12:47, Guillaume Ranquet ha scritto:
> > From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
> >
> > DPINTF is similar to DPI but does not have the exact same feature
> > set
> > or register layouts.
> >
> > DPINTF is the sink of the display pipeline that is connected to the
> > DisplayPort controller and encoder unit. It takes the same clocks
> > as
> > DPI.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml | 13
> > ++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.y
> > aml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.y
> > aml
> > index dd2896a40ff0..6d9f6c11806e 100644
> > ---
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.y
> > aml
> > +++
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.y
> > aml
> > @@ -4,16 +4,16 @@
> > $id:
> > http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml#
> > $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >
> > -title: mediatek DPI Controller Device Tree Bindings
> > +title: mediatek DPI/DPINTF Controller
> >
> > maintainers:
> > - CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
> > - Jitao shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
> >
> > description: |
> > - The Mediatek DPI function block is a sink of the display
> > subsystem and
> > - provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422 pixel data on a
> > parallel
> > - output bus.
> > + The Mediatek DPI and DPINTF function blocks are a sink of the
> > display
> > + subsystem and provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422
> > pixel data on a
> > + parallel output bus.
> >
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
> > - mediatek,mt8173-dpi
> > - mediatek,mt8183-dpi
> > - mediatek,mt8192-dpi
> > + - mediatek,mt8195-dpintf
> >
> > reg:
> > maxItems: 1
> > @@ -35,12 +36,14 @@ properties:
> > - description: Pixel Clock
> > - description: Engine Clock
> > - description: DPI PLL
> > + - description: Optional CK CG Clock
> >
> > clock-names:
> > items:
> > - const: pixel
> > - const: engine
> > - const: pll
> > + - const: ck_cg
>
> This is my understanding on how the DisplayPort Interface clocks work
> on 8195:
>
> The "engine" clock is for the *VPP Engine's DisplayPort ip/block*,
> "pll" is for TVD PLL divider selection
> "pixel" is the gate for the pixel clock to the connected display.
>
> "ck_cg" is useless, as that's the parent of "pixel" (and will always
> be)... for
> example, on mt8195... check clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo0.c - the
> CLK_VDO0_DP_INTF0_DP_INTF clock already has CLK_TOP_EDP as its
> parent, hence
> enabling the first will enable the latter.
>
> That said... you can most probably avoid adding the ck_cg clock, as
> if you try
> to turn that off while it's in use by its children, you'll be only
> decrementing
> a refcount, but no "real action" will ever take place.
>
>
> Regards,
> Angelo
Hello Chunfeng and Angelo,
ck_cg is a clock gate, and I try to remove it from drivers but it's
failed to enable dp_intf.
the block diagram is:
1. 26M->CLK_APMIXED_TVDPLL1(pll)->CLK_TOP_EDP(pixel)-
>CLK_VDO0_DP_INTF0_DP_INTF(ck_cg)->dp_intf
2. VDOSYS clock->CLK_VDO0_DP_INTF0(engine)->dp_intf
"engine" and "ck_cg" are all clock gates which control the clock source
input to dp_intf.
Maybe we just need to rename it?
If so, what name do you think we should modify?
BRs,
Bo-Chen
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists