linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/security-bugs: overhaul

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87o7z4fvod.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Tue, 07 Jun 2022 07:30:10 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Amit Shah <aams@...zon.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
        Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/security-bugs: overhaul

Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> writes:

> - what sense does it make to have embargoed-hardware-issues.rst and 
>   security-bugs.rst live in different Documentation/ subdirectories 
>   (admin-guide/ vs process/)? It'd seem to make sense to me to have them 
>   in one common place?

Yes, I think that would make sense...a lot of stuff got sorted out into
the various guides quickly, and it didn't all land in the right place.
I'd be in favor of moving this over to the process guide, and perhaps
making a security-specific section there.

Thanks,

jon