linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/security-bugs: overhaul

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220607140011.GE5885@1wt.eu>
Date:   Tue, 7 Jun 2022 16:00:11 +0200
From:   Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Amit Shah <aams@...zon.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
        Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/security-bugs: overhaul

On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 07:30:10AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> writes:
> 
> > - what sense does it make to have embargoed-hardware-issues.rst and 
> >   security-bugs.rst live in different Documentation/ subdirectories 
> >   (admin-guide/ vs process/)? It'd seem to make sense to me to have them 
> >   in one common place?
> 
> Yes, I think that would make sense...a lot of stuff got sorted out into
> the various guides quickly, and it didn't all land in the right place.
> I'd be in favor of moving this over to the process guide, and perhaps
> making a security-specific section there.

I, too, regularly search for it in process/, fail to find it then use
"find" to spot it under admin... Process seems more suitable to me at
least.

Willy