linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.17 000/772] 5.17.14-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYui20CoDeqa6OrCYB+CGpgoFkhXtkdMDFJd1H55efCm6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jun 2022 19:24:12 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.17 000/772] 5.17.14-rc1 review

On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.17.14 release.
> There are 772 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 09 Jun 2022 16:48:02 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.17.14-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.17.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.

Regressions found on qemu_x86_64:
  - kunit/kasan [1]

Regressions found on qemu_i386:
  - kunit/kfence [2]
  - kunit/test_out_of_bounds_read

We will bisect and let you know more details about this reported problem.

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

[1] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.17.y/build/v5.17.13-773-gd0f9b2818e1e/testrun/10038101/suite/kunit/test/kasan/details/
[2] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.17.y/build/v5.17.13-773-gd0f9b2818e1e/testrun/10038215/suite/kunit/test/kfence/details/

## Build
* kernel: 5.17.14-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.17.y
* git commit: d0f9b2818e1e4d43847e10d6e5310a0c653cb18f
* git describe: v5.17.13-773-gd0f9b2818e1e
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.17.y/build/v5.17.13-773-gd0f9b2818e1e

## Test Regressions (compared to v5.17.11-188-g8eb69e8f0d45)
Regressions found on qemu_x86_64:
  - kunit/kasan [1]

Regressions found on qemu_i386:
  - kunit/kfence [2]
  - kunit/test_out_of_bounds_read

## Metric Regressions (compared to v5.17.11-188-g8eb69e8f0d45)
No metric regressions found.

## Test Fixes (compared to v5.17.11-188-g8eb69e8f0d45)
No test fixes found.

## Metric Fixes (compared to v5.17.11-188-g8eb69e8f0d45)
No metric fixes found.

## Test result summary
total: 134591, pass: 121555, fail: 447, skip: 11730, xfail: 859

## Build Summary
* arm: 17 total, 14 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 17 total, 12 passed, 5 failed
* mips: 4 total, 1 passed, 3 failed
* parisc: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 5 total, 2 passed, 3 failed
* riscv: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 5 total, 2 passed, 3 failed
* sh: 2 total, 0 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 2 total, 2 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 20 total, 20 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* fwts
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org