linux-kernel - Re: [V2,1/2] media: media: jpegenc: add mediatek,mt8186-jpgenc compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220608150024.GA1398383-robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jun 2022 09:00:24 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Irui Wang <irui.wang@...iatek.com>
Cc:     kyrie wu <kyrie.wu@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, xia.jiang@...iatek.com,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...omium.org>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        maoguang.meng@...iatek.com,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [V2,1/2] media: media: jpegenc: add mediatek,mt8186-jpgenc
 compatible

On Wed, 08 Jun 2022 14:07:54 +0800, Irui Wang wrote:
> From: kyrie wu <kyrie.wu@...iatek.com>
> 
> Add mediatek,mt8186-jpgenc compatible to binding document.
> 
> MT8186 iommu support 0~16GB iova. We separate it to four banks:
> 0~4G; 4G~8G; 8G~12G; 12G~16G.
> 
> The "dma-ranges" could be used to adjust the bank we locate.
> If we don't set this property. The default range always is 0~4G.
> 
> Signed-off-by: kyrie wu <kyrie.wu@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek-jpeg-encoder.yaml    | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 


Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.