[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220608171334.730739-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 22:43:34 +0530
From: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rpmsg: virtio: Fix broken rpmsg_probe()
The rpmsg_probe() is broken at the moment because virtqueue_add_inbuf()
fails due to both virtqueues (Rx and Tx) marked as broken by the
__vring_new_virtqueue() function. To solve this, virtio_device_ready()
(which unbreaks queues) should be called before virtqueue_add_inbuf().
Fixes: 8b4ec69d7e09 ("virtio: harden vring IRQ")
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
---
drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
index 905ac7910c98..71a64d2c7644 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
@@ -929,6 +929,9 @@ static int rpmsg_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
/* and half is dedicated for TX */
vrp->sbufs = bufs_va + total_buf_space / 2;
+ /* From this point on, we can notify and get callbacks. */
+ virtio_device_ready(vdev);
+
/* set up the receive buffers */
for (i = 0; i < vrp->num_bufs / 2; i++) {
struct scatterlist sg;
@@ -983,9 +986,6 @@ static int rpmsg_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
*/
notify = virtqueue_kick_prepare(vrp->rvq);
- /* From this point on, we can notify and get callbacks. */
- virtio_device_ready(vdev);
-
/* tell the remote processor it can start sending messages */
/*
* this might be concurrent with callbacks, but we are only
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists