linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] netfs: Fix gcc-12 warning by embedding vfs inode in netfs_i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=whGrrF20LshkNGJ41UmNN13MU6x0_npwaJQi9cr626GQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jun 2022 15:05:46 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
        Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
        Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>,
        Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
        Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
        William Kucharski <william.kucharski@...cle.com>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
        samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfs: Fix gcc-12 warning by embedding vfs inode in netfs_i_context

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 3:04 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> IOW, I think you really should do something like the attached on top
> of this all.

Just to clarify: I did apply your patch. It's an improvement on what
used to go on.

I just think it wasn't as much of an improvement that it should have
been, and that largely untested patch I attached is I think another
step in a better direction.

                      Linus