linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] objtool: Add IBT validation / fixups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABCJKueigY+oJ0HTV_YXKcTZG35ACxPE_YpKp_ZURgzxNYQ4WA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jun 2022 17:05:58 -0700
From:   Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To:     Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@...gle.com>
Cc:     Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Joao Moreira <joao@...rdrivepizza.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        hjl.tools@...il.com, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] objtool: Add IBT validation / fixups

On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 10:53 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 7:06 PM Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> > One issue with this call sequence is that:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 02:38:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > caller:
> > >       cmpl    $0xdeadbeef, -0x4(%rax)         # 7 bytes
> >
> > Because this instruction ends in the constant 0xdeadbeef, it may
> > be used as a "gadget" that would effectively allow branching to an
> > arbitrary address in %rax if the attacker can arrange to set ZF=1.
>
> Do you mind elaborating how this instruction can be used as a gadget?
> How does it look like?

With the offset of -4, the je instruction here can be an indirect call
target because it's preceded by a valid type hash at the end of the
cmpl instruction. If we change the offset to -6, only the ud2
instruction is a potential call target in this sequence, which will be
less useful to an attacker.

> The information will be useful to the summary of Sami's KCFI LLVM
> patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119296

I'll add more information about the X86 preamble to the description.

Sami