Message-ID: <9d321f53-eabc-3f8d-79a9-f2c407aea6f1@quicinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jun 2022 19:46:35 +0530
From:   Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
CC:     dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH] drm/msm: Switch ordering of runpm put vs
 devfreq_idle

On 6/9/2022 2:17 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 12:36 PM Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com> wrote:
>> On 6/8/2022 3:00 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 7:52 AM Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>> On 9/27/2021 8:59 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>>>> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've seen a few crashes like:
>>>>>
>>>>>        Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000010 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>>>>>        Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_seq snd_seq_device bridge stp llc tun nf_nat_tftp nf_conntrack_tftp nf_nat_ftp nf_conntrack_ftp esp6 ah6 ip6t_REJECT ip6t_ipv6header vhost_vsock vhost vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common vsock rfcomm algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg uinput veth xt_cgroup xt_MASQUERADE venus_enc venus_dec videobuf2_dma_contig qcom_spmi_adc5 qcom_spmi_adc_tm5 hci_uart qcom_vadc_common cros_ec_typec qcom_spmi_temp_alarm typec btqca snd_soc_rt5682_i2c snd_soc_rt5682 snd_soc_sc7180 bluetooth snd_soc_qcom_common snd_soc_rl6231 ecdh_generic ecc venus_core v4l2_mem2mem snd_soc_lpass_sc7180 snd_soc_lpass_hdmi snd_soc_lpass_cpu snd_soc_lpass_platform snd_soc_max98357a ip6table_nat fuse iio_trig_sysfs cros_ec_lid_angle cros_ec_sensors cros_ec_sensors_core industrialio_triggered_buffer kfifo_buf cros_ec_sensorhub lzo_rle ath10k_snoc lzo_compress ath10k_core ath zram mac80211 cfg80211 ax88179_178a usbnet mii uvcvideo videobuf2_vmalloc joydev
>>>>>        CPU: 3 PID: 212 Comm: A618-worker Tainted: G W 5.4.139-16300-g88d8e1285982 #1
>>>>>        Hardware name: Google Pompom (rev1) with LTE (DT)
>>>>>        pstate: 60c00009 (nZCv daif +PAN +UAO)
>>>>>        pc : a6xx_gmu_set_oob+0x114/0x200
>>>>>        lr : a6xx_gmu_set_oob+0x10c/0x200
>>>>>        sp : ffffffc011b7bc20
>>>>>        x29: ffffffc011b7bc20 x28: ffffffdad27c5000
>>>>>        x27: 0000000000000001 x26: ffffffdad1521044
>>>>>        x25: ffffffbef7498338 x24: 0000000000000018
>>>>>        x23: 0000000000000002 x22: 0000000000014648
>>>>>        x21: 0000033732fe638b x20: 0000000080000000
>>>>>        x19: ffffffbef7433bc8 x18: 0000000040000000
>>>>>        x17: 000000243508d982 x16: 000000000000b67e
>>>>>        x15: 00000000000090d4 x14: 0000000000000024
>>>>>        x13: 0000000000000024 x12: 0000000000017521
>>>>>        x11: 0000000000000b48 x10: 0000000000326a48
>>>>>        x9 : 1a130d33f6371600 x8 : ffffffc011e54648
>>>>>        x7 : 614948e00005003c x6 : ffffffbe3cd17e60
>>>>>        x5 : 0000000000000040 x4 : 0000000000000004
>>>>>        x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffffffbef7488000
>>>>>        x1 : ffffffbef7488000 x0 : 0000000000000000
>>>>>        Call trace:
>>>>>        a6xx_gmu_set_oob+0x114/0x200
>>>>>        a6xx_gmu_set_freq+0xe0/0x1fc
>>>>>        msm_devfreq_target+0x80/0x13c
>>>>>        msm_devfreq_idle+0x54/0x94
>>>>>        retire_submit+0x170/0x254
>>>>>        retire_submits+0xa4/0xdc
>>>>>        retire_worker+0x1c/0x28
>>>>>        kthread_worker_fn+0xf4/0x1bc
>>>>>        kthread+0x140/0x158
>>>>>        ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>>>>>        Code: 52800c81 9415bbe5 f9400a68 8b160108 (b9400108)
>>>>>        ---[ end trace 16b871df2482cd61 ]---
>>>>>        Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
>>>>>        SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
>>>>>        Kernel Offset: 0x1ac1400000 from 0xffffffc010000000
>>>>>        PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffffc280000000
>>>>>        CPU features: 0x88102e,2a80aa38
>>>>>        Memory Limit: none
>>>>>
>>>>> Which smells a lot like touching hw after power collapse.  I'm not
>>>>> *entirely* sure how it could have taken 66ms (the autosuspend delay)
>>>>> before we get to a6xx_gmu_set_oob(), but to be safe we should move
>>>>> the pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() after msm_devfreq_idle().
>>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.15-rc1/source/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c#L132
>>>> We have this check in the gmu freq set path which should avoid this
>>>> scenario. I might be a bit pedantic here, but I feel that the original
>>>> code is more accurate. We should immediately mark last busy and put
>>>> runtime_pm refcount.
>>> So, I've been doing some experiments, changing the _put_autosuspend()
>>> to _put_sync(), in the course of tracking down some remaining "GMU
>>> OOB" timeout type issues and related badness, and discovered things
>>> very quickly die with SError splats like below.  Possibly the issue is
>>> that runpm has some race conditions, but I'm not sure we can trust
>>> pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() quite as much as one would like..
>>>
>>> -----------
>>> [   33.225332] CPU: 0 PID: 216 Comm: A618-worker Tainted: G        W
>>>         5.4.196 #7
>>> [   33.225337] Hardware name: Google Wormdingler rev1+ INX panel board (DT)
>>> [   33.225343] pstate: 20c00009 (nzCv daif +PAN +UAO)
>>> [   33.225353] pc : msm_readl+0x14/0x34
>>> [   33.225361] lr : a6xx_gpu_busy+0x40/0x80
>>> [   33.225365] sp : ffffffc011b93ad0
>>> [   33.225371] x29: ffffffc011b93ad0 x28: ffffffe77cba3000
>>> [   33.225377] x27: 0000000000000001 x26: ffffffe77bb4c4ac
>>> [   33.225384] x25: ffffffa2f227dfa0 x24: ffffffa2f22aab28
>>> [   33.225390] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffffffa2f22bf020
>>> [   33.225397] x21: ffffffa2f22bf000 x20: ffffffc011b93b10
>>> [   33.225404] x19: ffffffc011bd4110 x18: 000000000000000e
>>> [   33.225410] x17: 0000000000000004 x16: 000000000000000c
>>> [   33.225416] x15: 000001be3a969450 x14: 0000000000000400
>>> [   33.225423] x13: 00000000000101d6 x12: 0000000034155555
>>> [   33.225429] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000000
>>> [   33.225436] x9 : 0000000100000000 x8 : ffffffc011bd4000
>>> [   33.225443] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000007
>>> [   33.225450] x5 : ffffffc01d8b38f0 x4 : 0000000000000000
>>> [   33.225457] x3 : 00000000ffffffff x2 : 0000000000000002
>>> [   33.225463] x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffffc011bd4110
>>> [   33.225471] Call trace:
>>> [   33.225478]  msm_readl+0x14/0x34
>>> [   33.225484]  a6xx_gpu_busy+0x40/0x80
>>> [   33.225490]  msm_devfreq_get_dev_status+0x70/0x1d0
>>> [   33.225500]  devfreq_simple_ondemand_func+0x34/0x100
>>> [   33.225510]  update_devfreq+0x50/0xe8
>>> [   33.225517]  qos_notifier_call+0x2c/0x64
>>> [   33.225523]  qos_max_notifier_call+0x1c/0x2c
>>> [   33.225532]  notifier_call_chain+0x58/0x98
>>> [   33.225539]  __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x74/0x84
>>> [   33.225545]  blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x38/0x48
>>> [   33.225554]  pm_qos_update_target+0xf8/0x19c
>>> [   33.225560]  freq_qos_apply+0x54/0x6c
>>> [   33.225566]  apply_constraint+0x60/0x104
>>> [   33.225572]  __dev_pm_qos_update_request+0xb4/0x184
>>> [   33.225578]  dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x58
>>> [   33.225584]  msm_devfreq_idle_work+0x34/0x40
>>> [   33.225591]  kthread_worker_fn+0x144/0x1c8
>>> [   33.225597]  kthread+0x140/0x284
>>> [   33.225604]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>>> [   33.225617] Code: f9000bf3 910003fd aa0003f3 d503201f (b9400260)
>>> [   33.225623] ---[ end trace f6309767a42d0831 ]---
>>> [   33.236185] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
>>> [   33.236186] Kernel Offset: 0x276b600000 from 0xffffffc010000000
>>> [   33.236186] PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffffdf80000000
>>> [   33.236187] CPU features: 0x088102e,2a80aa38
>>> -----------
>> Any chance we are racing with system suspend here? Because, when
>> "dev->power.disable_depth > 0", pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() returns
>> -EINVAL. Then I guess we should look for a positive return value from
>> pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() before proceeding.
> I think that is possible.. although I can still still SErrors in
> a6xx_gpu_busy() with:
>
> ----------
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> index 1ec90a9ca56c..61e1e33f355a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ void a6xx_gmu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct
> dev_pm_opp *opp)
>           * This can get called from devfreq while the hardware is idle. Don't
>           * bring up the power if it isn't already active
>           */
> -       if (pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(gmu->dev) == 0)
> +       if (pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(gmu->dev) <= 0)
>                  return;
>
>          if (!gmu->legacy) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> index 95a6c3361a1e..b17a95f7b85c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> @@ -1456,7 +1456,7 @@ static u64 a6xx_gpu_busy(struct msm_gpu *gpu,
> unsigned long *out_sample_rate)
>          *out_sample_rate = 19200000;
>
>          /* Only read the gpu busy if the hardware is already active */
> -       if (pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(a6xx_gpu->gmu.dev) == 0)
> +       if (pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(a6xx_gpu->gmu.dev) <= 0)
>                  return 0;
>
>          busy_cycles = gmu_read64(&a6xx_gpu->gmu,
> ----------
>
> So I don't think this completely explains it
>
> I am starting to think it might not be a bad idea to drain the gpu's
> kthread working in the suspend path
If it helps, draining kthread sounds like a better solution compared to 
the current patch. Because msm_devfreq_idle() is queuing a work which 
can still race with autosuspend + system-suspend under enough system 
pressure.

-Akhil.
>
> BR,
> -R
>
>> -Akhil.
>>>> -Akhil.
>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 9bc95570175a ("drm/msm: Devfreq tuning")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c | 6 +++---
>>>>>     1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c
>>>>> index d1a16642ecd5..2b2bbe7499e6 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c
>>>>> @@ -667,9 +667,6 @@ static void retire_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_ringbuffer *ring,
>>>>>
>>>>>         msm_submit_retire(submit);
>>>>>
>>>>> -     pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&gpu->pdev->dev);
>>>>> -     pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&gpu->pdev->dev);
>>>>> -
>>>>>         spin_lock_irqsave(&ring->submit_lock, flags);
>>>>>         list_del(&submit->node);
>>>>>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->submit_lock, flags);
>>>>> @@ -683,6 +680,9 @@ static void retire_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_ringbuffer *ring,
>>>>>         mutex_unlock(&gpu->active_lock);
>>>>>
>>>>>         msm_gem_submit_put(submit);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&gpu->pdev->dev);
>>>>> +     pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&gpu->pdev->dev);
>>>>>     }
>>>>>
>>>>>     static void retire_submits(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists