[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AS8PR04MB86767131E8EA4AA6AC38192A8CA69@AS8PR04MB8676.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 07:09:35 +0000
From: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: "l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"jingoohan1@...il.com" <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"francesco.dolcini@...adex.com" <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 5/8] PCI: imx6: Refine the regulator usage
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> Sent: 2022年6月10日 1:20
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> Cc: l.stach@...gutronix.de; bhelgaas@...gle.com; robh+dt@...nel.org;
> broonie@...nel.org; lorenzo.pieralisi@....com; jingoohan1@...il.com;
> festevam@...il.com; francesco.dolcini@...adex.com;
> linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kernel@...gutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] PCI: imx6: Refine the regulator usage
>
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 06:19:47AM +0000, Hongxing Zhu wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> > > Sent: 2022年6月9日 2:55
> > > To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > > Cc: l.stach@...gutronix.de; bhelgaas@...gle.com; robh+dt@...nel.org;
> > > broonie@...nel.org; lorenzo.pieralisi@....com; jingoohan1@...il.com;
> > > festevam@...il.com; francesco.dolcini@...adex.com;
> > > linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kernel@...gutronix.de; dl-linux-imx
> > > <linux-imx@....com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] PCI: imx6: Refine the regulator usage
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 09:47:06AM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > > > The driver should undo any enables it did itself. The regulator
> > > > disable shouldn't be basing decisions on regulator_is_enabled().
>
> The driver should disable things if an error occurs after it has enabled
> something, or if it enabled something during probe and we're now detaching
> the driver. That doesn't look like the case here.
>
> > > > To keep the balance of the regulator usage counter, disable the
> > > > regulator just behind of imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset() in resume
> > > > and shutdown.
> > >
> > > In subject, "Refine" doesn't tell me anything about what's happening here.
> >
> > Thanks for your comments.
> > How about the following one?
> > PCI: imx6: Do regulator disable without the regulator_is_enabled check
>
> That's too low-level, like describing the C code line by line.
> I'm hoping for something about the purpose for the patch so "git log --oneline"
> can tell a coherent story.
>
> Apparently this is about disabling the power regulator when the slot isn't being
> used, so maybe it could say something about that.
>
> $ git grep -Ep "regulator_(en|dis)able" drivers/pci/controller/
>
> shows that in other drivers, this being done in
> probe/remove/suspend/resume-type paths. imx6 should be similar.
>
Got that, thanks a lot.
Best Regards
Richard Zhu
> Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists