[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220613140206.GA6910@blackbody.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 16:02:06 +0200
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/8] cgroup/cpuset: Allow no-task partition to have
empty cpuset.cpus.effective
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 04:55:13PM -1000, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> But how would that happen? A lot of other things would break too if that
> were to happen.
cpuset is a threaded controller where the internal-node-constraint does
not hold. So the additional condition for cpuset migrations is IMO
warranted (and needed if there's no "fall up").
Michal
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists