linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] fs fix for v5.19-rc3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 09:31:32 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] fs fix for v5.19-rc3

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 3:39 AM Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> This fixes an issue where we fail to change the group of a file when the caller
> owns the file and is a member of the group to change to. This is only relevant
> on idmapped mounts.

Pulled, but this code makes me go "Eww".

I do get the feeling that maybe we should have some kind of static
type help here, with "unmapped" and "filesystem mapped" uid/gid values
having different types, the same way we have kuid_t vs uid_t for
user-namespace mapping.

Because it feels like the problem here is that "kgid_t" has different
meanings depending on context.

In fact, just within that one function, we have *three* very different kgid_t's:

 - the argument to the function is a "kgid_t gid", which has *not*
been mapped into the filesystem mapping (why not?)

 - the function itself declares a "kgid_t kgid", which is the inode
group ID mapped into the mount

 - it how additionally has that thied "kgid_t mapped_gid", which is
the first 'gid' mapped into the mount

and honestly, I find that hugely confusing. The naming doesn't exactly
clarify things either (ie "gid" is a "kgid_t", not a "git_t", and so
is "kgid" - not helpful).

And being confusing with no type system support isn't a great thing.

So I'm wondering if <linux/mnt_idmapping.h> might be able to do the
same kind of things we do in <linux/uidgid.h>.

NOTE: I did not look into just how hugely painful that would be. Maybe
the above is the rantings of a madman.

              Linus