[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12e3bb72-af2d-653f-b342-c6b4d6a1f292@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:15:15 -0700
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Max Krummenacher <max.oss.09@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@...adex.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Andrejs Cainikovs <andrejs.cainikovs@...adex.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] power: domain: Add driver for a PM domain provider
which controls
On 15/06/2022 09:10, Max Krummenacher wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 9:22 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 9:15 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 05:08:46PM +0200, Max Krummenacher wrote:
>>>> From: Max Krummenacher <max.krummenacher@...adex.com>
>>>>
>>>> its power enable by using a regulator.
>>>>
>>>> The currently implemented PM domain providers are all specific to
>>>> a particular system on chip.
>>>
>>> Yes, power domains tend to be specific to an SoC... 'power-domains' is
>>> supposed to be power islands in a chip. Linux 'PM domains' can be
>>> anything...
>
> I don't see why such power islands should be restricted to a SoC. You can
> build the exact same idea on a PCB or even more modular designs.
In the SoC these power islands are more-or-less defined. These are real
regions gated by some control knob.
Calling few devices on a board "power domain" does not make it a power
domain. There is no grouping, there is no control knob.
Aren't you now re-implementing regulator supplies? How is this different
than existing supplies?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists