linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 10/14] i2c: qcom-cci: add msm8974 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 19:13:09 +0200
From:   Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
        Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        matti.lehtimaki@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/14] i2c: qcom-cci: add msm8974 compatible

On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:20, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 06:27:58PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > From: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@...il.com>
> >
> > MSM8974 CCI is the same as MSM8916 except it has two masters.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtimaki@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
> > ---
> > To note, the cci_v1_5_data variable name is just a bit arbitrary and
> > isn't meant to reflect IP version "1.5". I'd be happy to change the
> > variable name to something else.
>
> Loic, Robert: I know this series is marked RFC, but the I2C patches
> adding a new SoC to the driver are maybe interesting already?

Yes I agree, no objection to get them.

Regards,
Loic