[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve+vrfSu6pD+AKe-eCVA2pC5o520y4gVwLNg9Dtk0U5bw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:21:46 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: stefan.seyfried@...glemail.com
Cc: Kenneth Chan <kenneth.t.chan@...il.com>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Seyfried <seife+kernel@...systems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: allow to use all hotkeys
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 3:54 PM <stefan.seyfried@...glemail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Stefan Seyfried <seife+kernel@...systems.com>
>
> commit ed83c9171829 broke the hotkeys on my Toughbook CF-51.
The commit
> I'm questioning the general validity of that commit, but as I only
> have a single machine to test, add a module parameter to allow making
> it work at runtime.
Thanks for the report and the fix, my comments below.
> +static bool hotkey_input;
> +module_param(hotkey_input, bool, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(hotkey_input, "Send all hotkeys to the input subsystem");
We usually add module options in very bad cases where it's very useful
for debugging or when some devices require the opposite settings while
can't be distinguished automatically. Here I do not see either of such
cases. Hence, I would prefer to see a DMI based quirk as it's done a
lot in the PDx86 drivers. Can you do that?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists