lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:46:03 +0200
From:   Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
CC:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: helping with remapping vmem for dma

Am 15. Juni 2022 15:17:00 MESZ schrieb Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>:
>On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 02:15:33PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Put simply, if you want to call dma_map_single() on a buffer, then that 
>> buffer needs to be allocated with kmalloc() (or technically alloc_pages(), 
>> but then dma_map_page() would make more sense when dealing with entire 
>> pages.
>
>Yes.  It sounds like the memory here comes from the dma coherent
>allocator, in which case the code need to use the address returned
>by that and not create another mapping.

As i have not found position where memory is allocated (this is a very huge and dirty driver) is it maybe possible to check if buf is such "allready dma" memory (maybe is_vmalloc_addr) and call dma_single_map only if not (using original buf if yes)?

But i guess it should map only a part of available (pre-allocated) memory and other parts of this are used somewhere else. So i can ran into some issues caused by sharing this full block in different functions.
Hi,

Thanks for first suggestions. 
regards Frank

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ