[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3de597c1ab963cc8f6dd89da089c6f0660517f34.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:12:28 +0800
From: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>
CC: "sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"wenst@...omium.org" <wenst@...omium.org>,
"Miles Chen (陳民樺)"
<Miles.Chen@...iatek.com>,
"chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com" <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<jitao.shi@...iatek.com>, <mandyjh.liu@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: clk-mt8195-vdo0: Set rate on
vdo0_dp_intf0_dp_intf's parent
On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 17:10 +0800, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Add the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag to the CLK_VDO0_DP_INTF0_DP_INTF
> clock: this is required to trigger clock source selection on
> CLK_TOP_EDP, while avoiding to manage the enablement of the former
> separately from the latter in the displayport driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo0.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo0.c
> b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo0.c
> index 261a7f76dd3c..07b46bfd5040 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo0.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo0.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ static const struct mtk_gate_regs vdo0_2_cg_regs =
> {
> #define GATE_VDO0_2(_id, _name, _parent, _shift)
> \
> GATE_MTK(_id, _name, _parent, &vdo0_2_cg_regs, _shift,
> &mtk_clk_gate_ops_setclr)
>
> +#define GATE_VDO0_2_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parent, _shift, _flags)
> \
> + GATE_MTK_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parent, &vdo0_2_cg_regs, _shift,
> \
> + &mtk_clk_gate_ops_setclr, _flags)
> +
> static const struct mtk_gate vdo0_clks[] = {
> /* VDO0_0 */
> GATE_VDO0_0(CLK_VDO0_DISP_OVL0, "vdo0_disp_ovl0", "top_vpp",
> 0),
> @@ -85,7 +89,8 @@ static const struct mtk_gate vdo0_clks[] = {
> /* VDO0_2 */
> GATE_VDO0_2(CLK_VDO0_DSI0_DSI, "vdo0_dsi0_dsi", "top_dsi_occ",
> 0),
> GATE_VDO0_2(CLK_VDO0_DSI1_DSI, "vdo0_dsi1_dsi", "top_dsi_occ",
> 8),
> - GATE_VDO0_2(CLK_VDO0_DP_INTF0_DP_INTF, "vdo0_dp_intf0_dp_intf",
> "top_edp", 16),
> + GATE_VDO0_2_FLAGS(CLK_VDO0_DP_INTF0_DP_INTF,
> "vdo0_dp_intf0_dp_intf",
> + "top_edp", 16, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT),
> };
>
> static int clk_mt8195_vdo0_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.35.1
>
Hello Angelo,
Thanks for this patch.
Another dp clock should also be fix.
After confirming with Jitao who is our dp expert.
The parent of CLK_VDO1_DPINTF should be top_dp instead of top_vpp.
Thanks!
--- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo1.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo1.c
@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ static const struct mtk_gate_regs vdo1_3_cg_regs = {
#define GATE_VDO1_2(_id, _name, _parent,
_shift) \
GATE_MTK(_id, _name, _parent, &vdo1_2_cg_regs, _shift,
&mtk_clk_gate_ops_setclr)
+#define GATE_VDO1_2_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parent, _shift,
_flags) \
+ GATE_MTK_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parent, &vdo1_2_cg_regs, _shift,
&mtk_clk_gate_ops_setclr, _flags)
+
#define GATE_VDO1_3(_id, _name, _parent,
_shift) \
GATE_MTK(_id, _name, _parent, &vdo1_3_cg_regs, _shift,
&mtk_clk_gate_ops_setclr)
@@ -99,7 +102,7 @@ static const struct mtk_gate vdo1_clks[] = {
GATE_VDO1_2(CLK_VDO1_DISP_MONITOR_DPI0,
"vdo1_disp_monitor_dpi0", "top_vpp", 1),
GATE_VDO1_2(CLK_VDO1_DPI1, "vdo1_dpi1", "top_vpp", 8),
GATE_VDO1_2(CLK_VDO1_DISP_MONITOR_DPI1,
"vdo1_disp_monitor_dpi1", "top_vpp", 9),
- GATE_VDO1_2(CLK_VDO1_DPINTF, "vdo1_dpintf", "top_vpp", 16),
+ GATE_VDO1_2_FLAGS(CLK_VDO1_DPINTF, "vdo1_dpintf", "top_dp", 16,
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT),
BRs,
Bo-Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists