linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.123-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a05678bb-29f8-23ea-9260-cc1cece3f480@w6rz.net>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jun 2022 02:46:39 -0700
From:   Ron Economos <re@...z.net>
To:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.123-rc1 review

On 6/16/22 1:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 14/06/2022 19:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.123 release.
>> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Thu, 16 Jun 2022 18:37:02 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.123-rc1.gz 
>>
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git 
>> linux-5.10.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>
> No new regressions for Tegra. I am seeing the following kernel warning 
> that is causing a boot test to fail, but this has been happening for a 
> few releases now (I would have reported it earlier but we have been 
> having some infrastructure issues) ...
>
>  WARNING KERN urandom_read_iter: 82 callbacks suppressed
>
> This appears to be introduced by commit "random: convert to using 
> fops->read_iter()" [0]. Interestingly, I am not seeing this in the 
> mainline as far as I can tell and so I am not sure if there is 
> something else that is missing?
>
I'm also seeing this on RISC-V. 5.15 and 5.17, but not 5.18.