[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51786b52-a33c-96c3-583b-2fd2d158ad5d@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 11:11:25 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Ron Economos <re@...z.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
slade@...dewatkins.com,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/11] 5.10.123-rc1 review
On 16/06/2022 10:46, Ron Economos wrote:
> On 6/16/22 1:48 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 14/06/2022 19:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.123 release.
>>> There are 11 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 16 Jun 2022 18:37:02 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.123-rc1.gz
>>>
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>>> linux-5.10.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>> No new regressions for Tegra. I am seeing the following kernel warning
>> that is causing a boot test to fail, but this has been happening for a
>> few releases now (I would have reported it earlier but we have been
>> having some infrastructure issues) ...
>>
>> WARNING KERN urandom_read_iter: 82 callbacks suppressed
>>
>> This appears to be introduced by commit "random: convert to using
>> fops->read_iter()" [0]. Interestingly, I am not seeing this in the
>> mainline as far as I can tell and so I am not sure if there is
>> something else that is missing?
>>
> I'm also seeing this on RISC-V. 5.15 and 5.17, but not 5.18.
>
That's good to know. I don't see this on 5.18 either, just 5.10, 5.15
and 5.17.
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists