linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add quackingstick dts files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XyAbZEhny4_NdnEZD44VgatdODfY36ufx_omg7gApV4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jun 2022 13:35:41 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     "Joseph S. Barrera III" <joebar@...omium.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add quackingstick dts files

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 11:12 AM Joseph S. Barrera III
<joebar@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-quackingstick.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-quackingstick.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d39f43757932
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-quackingstick.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Google Quackingstick board device tree source
> + *
> + * Copyright 2021 Google LLC.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "sc7180.dtsi"
> +
> +ap_ec_spi: &spi6 {};
> +ap_h1_spi: &spi0 {};
> +
> +#include "sc7180-trogdor.dtsi"

In my response to your v5, I explicitly pointed out that you should
take into account this patch that landed downstream since you posted
your v5.

https://crrev.com/c/3652958

...but you don't seem to have taken it into account.

-Doug