linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5] riscv: Add qspinlock support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJF2gTT9YHgTzPaBN4ekYS7UcBOj_9k9xEcrsoXgW6PCZc8x3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jun 2022 07:02:51 +0800
From:   Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] riscv: Add qspinlock support

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 4:42 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 5:54 PM <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >+config RISCV_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> > +       bool "Using queued spinlock instead of ticket-lock"
>
> Maybe we can just make ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> user visible and give users the choice between the two generic
> implementations across all architectures that support the qspinlock
> variant.
>
> In arch/riscv, you'd then just have a
>
>         select ARCH_HAVE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
Good point, but I think it should be another cross-arch cleanup
patchset, let's put qspinlock in riscv first with the current
framework.

>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..fd3fd09cff52
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +#ifndef __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
> > +#define __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> > +#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> > +#include <asm/qrwlock.h>
> > +#else
> > +#include <asm-generic/spinlock.h>
> > +#endif
> > +
>
> Along the same lines:
>
> I think I'd prefer the header changes to be done in the asm-generic
> version of this file, so this can be shared across all architectures
> that want to give the choice between ticket and queued spinlock.
I would put the above part in the series, but they would base on the
riscv qspinlock patch.

>
>         Arnd



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/