[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5328a76b3fab1f20b3ffc400ca2402bec19d9700.1655761627.git.ashish.kalra@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 23:03:27 +0000
From: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
To: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <jroedel@...e.de>,
<thomas.lendacky@....com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <ardb@...nel.org>,
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>, <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
<jmattson@...gle.com>, <luto@...nel.org>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <slp@...hat.com>,
<pgonda@...gle.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, <rientjes@...gle.com>,
<dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>, <tobin@....com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<michael.roth@....com>, <vbabka@...e.cz>, <kirill@...temov.name>,
<ak@...ux.intel.com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>, <marcorr@...gle.com>,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
<alpergun@...gle.com>, <dgilbert@...hat.com>, <jarkko@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH Part2 v6 08/49] x86/traps: Define RMP violation #PF error code
From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Bit 31 in the page fault-error bit will be set when processor encounters
an RMP violation.
While at it, use the BIT_ULL() macro.
Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h | 18 +++++++++++-------
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h
index 10b1de500ab1..89b705114b3f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
#ifndef _ASM_X86_TRAP_PF_H
#define _ASM_X86_TRAP_PF_H
+#include <linux/bits.h> /* BIT() macro */
+
/*
* Page fault error code bits:
*
@@ -12,15 +14,17 @@
* bit 4 == 1: fault was an instruction fetch
* bit 5 == 1: protection keys block access
* bit 15 == 1: SGX MMU page-fault
+ * bit 31 == 1: fault was due to RMP violation
*/
enum x86_pf_error_code {
- X86_PF_PROT = 1 << 0,
- X86_PF_WRITE = 1 << 1,
- X86_PF_USER = 1 << 2,
- X86_PF_RSVD = 1 << 3,
- X86_PF_INSTR = 1 << 4,
- X86_PF_PK = 1 << 5,
- X86_PF_SGX = 1 << 15,
+ X86_PF_PROT = BIT_ULL(0),
+ X86_PF_WRITE = BIT_ULL(1),
+ X86_PF_USER = BIT_ULL(2),
+ X86_PF_RSVD = BIT_ULL(3),
+ X86_PF_INSTR = BIT_ULL(4),
+ X86_PF_PK = BIT_ULL(5),
+ X86_PF_SGX = BIT_ULL(15),
+ X86_PF_RMP = BIT_ULL(31),
};
#endif /* _ASM_X86_TRAP_PF_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index fad8faa29d04..a4c270e99f7f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ show_fault_oops(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long ad
!(error_code & X86_PF_PROT) ? "not-present page" :
(error_code & X86_PF_RSVD) ? "reserved bit violation" :
(error_code & X86_PF_PK) ? "protection keys violation" :
+ (error_code & X86_PF_RMP) ? "RMP violation" :
"permissions violation");
if (!(error_code & X86_PF_USER) && user_mode(regs)) {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists