lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff5ac808-fde9-57ee-7d47-a4999428210e@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 12:00:35 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_crc: Merge Intel PMIC core to
 crc

Hi,

On 6/20/22 11:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:51:33AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for this series, cleaning this up is long overdue.
>>
>> The entire series looks good to me:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>
>> for the series.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
>> Maybe do a follow up renaming CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC to
>> CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_CRC and also change the module name
>> from intel-soc-pmic to intel-soc-pmic-crc ?
> 
> I thought about that, but decided to leave it for later since it will take a
> lot of subsystems and better to be considered out of the scope of this series.
> 
> Do you agree?

Sure we can do this later. Note that there are not that much dependencies
on INTEL_SOC_PMIC though. The ones which I could find are:

drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/Kconfig: config TYPEC_WCOVE
-which is wrong regardless of the rename and should just be dropped
 in a separate/unrelated patch. can you submit a patch for this ?

drivers/gpio/Kconfig: config GPIO_CRYSTAL_COVE
drivers/pwm/Kconfig: config PWM_CRC
drivers/acpi/pmic/Kconfig: config BYTCRC_PMIC_OPREGION &&
                           config CHTCRC_PMIC_OPREGION

So not that much, but still 3 subystems, so yeah probably best
to do that cleanup later,

Regards,

Hans


> 
>> I don't expect any userspace dependencies on the module-name
>> (there are no module parameters) so this should be fine.
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ