linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] mfd: intel_soc_pmic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YrBPjzOaAjqSZBqD@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:44:31 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_crc: Merge Intel PMIC core to
 crc

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 12:00:35PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 6/20/22 11:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:51:33AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:

...

> >> Maybe do a follow up renaming CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC to
> >> CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_CRC and also change the module name
> >> from intel-soc-pmic to intel-soc-pmic-crc ?
> > 
> > I thought about that, but decided to leave it for later since it will take a
> > lot of subsystems and better to be considered out of the scope of this series.
> > 
> > Do you agree?
> 
> Sure we can do this later. Note that there are not that much dependencies
> on INTEL_SOC_PMIC though. The ones which I could find are:
> 
> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/Kconfig: config TYPEC_WCOVE
> -which is wrong regardless of the rename and should just be dropped
>  in a separate/unrelated patch. can you submit a patch for this ?

Sure...

Done!

> drivers/gpio/Kconfig: config GPIO_CRYSTAL_COVE
> drivers/pwm/Kconfig: config PWM_CRC
> drivers/acpi/pmic/Kconfig: config BYTCRC_PMIC_OPREGION &&
>                            config CHTCRC_PMIC_OPREGION
> 
> So not that much, but still 3 subystems, so yeah probably best
> to do that cleanup later,

Yup, let's do it later with Type-C fix in mind, that will save us
doing unneeded churn.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko