linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc: kernel: Change the order of of_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 11:11:33 +0000
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Liang He <windhl@....com>
CC:     "mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        "paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
        "wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com" <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        "gpiccoli@...lia.com" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
        "aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com" <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: kernel: Change the order of of_node_put()

Hi,

Le 20/06/2022 à 11:23, Liang He a écrit :
> 
> Hi, Christophe.
> 
> Sorry to trobule you again.
> 
> Now I have found other bugs in same directories (i.e., arch/powerpc/sysdev),
> with the ones I have sent but not recieved acked-by or confirmed email.
> 
> So I need to merge the old ones into the new ones as a PATCH-v2 and then resend the
> old ones ?
> or just use a new PATCH to send only new ones?
> 
> I am afraid to make new trouble for maintainers, so can you share your valuable
> experience?
> 

Here is the list of your patches : 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?submitter=84258

 From my point of view, for all the patches that are still in status 
"new" it is better than you send a v2 with more things into a single 
patch. When the patch is in "under review" state, it is better to not 
update it anymore.

So in the list there are for instance several patches for powernv, so it 
would be good if you can regroup all of them in a single v2 patch.

Christophe