[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16a2a6b2.8542.1818114aeea.Coremail.windhl@126.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 20:27:05 +0800 (CST)
From: "Liang He" <windhl@....com>
To: "Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: "mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
"wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com" <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
"gpiccoli@...lia.com" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
"aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com" <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] powerpc: kernel: Change the order of of_node_put()
At 2022-06-20 19:11:33, "Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Le 20/06/2022 à 11:23, Liang He a écrit :
>>
>> Hi, Christophe.
>>
>> Sorry to trobule you again.
>>
>> Now I have found other bugs in same directories (i.e., arch/powerpc/sysdev),
>> with the ones I have sent but not recieved acked-by or confirmed email.
>>
>> So I need to merge the old ones into the new ones as a PATCH-v2 and then resend the
>> old ones ?
>> or just use a new PATCH to send only new ones?
>>
>> I am afraid to make new trouble for maintainers, so can you share your valuable
>> experience?
>>
>
>Here is the list of your patches :
>https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?submitter=84258
>
> From my point of view, for all the patches that are still in status
>"new" it is better than you send a v2 with more things into a single
>patch. When the patch is in "under review" state, it is better to not
>update it anymore.
>
>So in the list there are for instance several patches for powernv, so it
>would be good if you can regroup all of them in a single v2 patch.
>
>Christophe
Thanks, Christophe.
I will follow your rules and try to group the 'new' state ones.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists