lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 20:27:05 +0800 (CST)
From:   "Liang He" <windhl@....com>
To:     "Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc:     "mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        "paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
        "wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com" <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        "gpiccoli@...lia.com" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
        "aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com" <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] powerpc: kernel: Change the order of of_node_put()




At 2022-06-20 19:11:33, "Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Le 20/06/2022 à 11:23, Liang He a écrit :
>> 
>> Hi, Christophe.
>> 
>> Sorry to trobule you again.
>> 
>> Now I have found other bugs in same directories (i.e., arch/powerpc/sysdev),
>> with the ones I have sent but not recieved acked-by or confirmed email.
>> 
>> So I need to merge the old ones into the new ones as a PATCH-v2 and then resend the
>> old ones ?
>> or just use a new PATCH to send only new ones?
>> 
>> I am afraid to make new trouble for maintainers, so can you share your valuable
>> experience?
>> 
>
>Here is the list of your patches : 
>https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?submitter=84258
>
> From my point of view, for all the patches that are still in status 
>"new" it is better than you send a v2 with more things into a single 
>patch. When the patch is in "under review" state, it is better to not 
>update it anymore.
>
>So in the list there are for instance several patches for powernv, so it 
>would be good if you can regroup all of them in a single v2 patch.
>
>Christophe

Thanks, Christophe.

I will follow your rules and try to group the 'new' state ones.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ