[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e806c40-f190-b688-4b60-6fbf3520ff3e@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:35:32 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/11] iommu/vt-d: Add SVA domain support
On 2022/6/17 15:47, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 9:50 AM
>>
>> +
>> +static const struct iommu_domain_ops intel_svm_domain_ops = {
>> + .set_dev_pasid = intel_svm_attach_dev_pasid,
>> + .block_dev_pasid = intel_svm_detach_dev_pasid,
>> + .free = intel_svm_domain_free,
>> +};
>> +
>
> It's clearer to use set/block for intel callbacks.
Yes. That reads clearer.
--
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists