[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276F6765461543CD9D2D0D98CAF9@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 07:47:17 +0000
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
CC: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 05/11] iommu/vt-d: Add SVA domain support
> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2022 9:50 AM
>
> +
> +static const struct iommu_domain_ops intel_svm_domain_ops = {
> + .set_dev_pasid = intel_svm_attach_dev_pasid,
> + .block_dev_pasid = intel_svm_detach_dev_pasid,
> + .free = intel_svm_domain_free,
> +};
> +
It's clearer to use set/block for intel callbacks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists