linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Add support for Xilinx Versal CPM5 Root Port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Jun 2022 17:28:34 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, michals@...inx.com, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Add support for Xilinx Versal CPM5 Root Port

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 05:06:51PM +0530, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> Xilinx Versal Premium series has CPM5 block which supports Root Port
> functioning at Gen5 speed.
> 
> Xilinx Versal CPM5 has few changes with existing CPM block.
> - CPM5 has dedicated register space for control and status registers.
> - CPM5 legacy interrupt handling needs additonal register bit
>   to enable and handle legacy interrupts.
> 
> Changes in v5:
> - Added of_device_get_match_data to identify CPM version.
> 
> 
> Bharat Kumar Gogada (2):
>   dt-bindings: PCI: xilinx-cpm: Add Versal CPM5 Root Port
>   PCI: xilinx-cpm: Add support for Versal CPM5 Root Port
> 
>  .../bindings/pci/xilinx-versal-cpm.yaml       | 48 ++++++++++++--
>  drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx-cpm.c      | 62 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

This is the third "v5" posting:

  #1 Jun 16 https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220616124429.12917-1-bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com
  #2 Jun 18 https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220618024459.7554-1-bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com
  #3 Jun 21 https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220621113653.2354462-1-bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com

This makes things harder than necessary.

I commented on a couple things in #2, and you said you were going to
fix them, but they aren't fixed in #3.

It will also make things easier if you include the MAINTAINERS patch
in the same series.  There's no reason for it to be separate.

Can you please post a v6 with the updates?

Bjorn