lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Jun 2022 16:34:25 +0800 (CST)
From:   "Liang He" <windhl@....com>
To:     "Marc Zyngier" <maz@...nel.org>,
        "Miaoqian Lin" <linmq006@...il.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] irqchip: Add missing of_ndoe_get() in its_of_probe()




At 2022-06-22 16:29:49, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 09:15:56 +0100,
>"Liang He" <windhl@....com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> At 2022-06-22 16:03:26, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>> >+ Miaoqian Lin
>> >
>> >On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 07:21:38 +0100,
>> >Liang He <windhl@....com> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> We need to add missing of_node_get() for of_find_matching_node() to
>> >> keep refcount balance.
>> >> 
>> >> Note: of_find_matching_node() will decrease the refcount of its first
>> >> arg.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@....com>
>> >
>> >[...]
>> >
>> >Please send these refcount fixes as a series for all the irqchip
>> >drivers, not one every other day.
>> >
>> 
>> Sorry, I will group similar bugs  in future.
>> 
>> 
>> >And please synchronise with Miaoqian Lin, as you are obviously both
>> >chasing the same bugs.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >	M.
>> 
>> Yes, before I send any new bug, I will confirm that this bug has not
>> been reported in lore.kernel.org.
>
>This is not what I meant. I am asking you to actively coordinate with
>Miaoqian, working with them as a team instead of you both sending
>competing series. I would like to see one series with patches from you
>both.

OK, I get it. This depends on Miaoqian.

@linm006@...il.com

>
>> By the way, this is a bug missing |GET|, not |PUT|, which is
>> different with Miaoqian's and my patches before.
>
>Well, yet another reason for you both to work together, as you are
>complementing each other.
>
>Thanks,
>
>	M.
>
>-- 
>Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ