[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e2ce3ed-0f16-c727-a4a3-befa347e16d0@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:03:11 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: order clocks according to
bindings
On 09/05/2022 16:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The CAMSS DTSI device node, which came after the bindings were merged,
> got the clocks ordered differently then specified in the bindings:
>
> sdm636-sony-xperia-ganges-mermaid.dtb: camss@...0000: reg-names:4: 'csid3' was expected
>
> Reordering them to match bindings should not cause ABI issues, because
> the driver relies on names, not ordering.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi | 168 +++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
>
The media/bindings patch was accepted. What about DTS? Any comments?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists