[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a686e9da-c825-5f53-1320-65be4cb0b8af@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 10:04:20 +0000
From: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To: <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>, <will@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>
CC: <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm:kernel:Fix typo in comment
On 22/06/2022 09:37, Jilin Yuan wrote:
> Delete the redundant word 'ARM'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@...rlc.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 054e9199f30d..0b3c8f2ff7b0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static int get_num_wrps(void)
> * know which watchpoint fired. In the future we can either add a
> * disassembler and address generation emulator, or we can insert a
> * check to see if the DFAR is set on watchpoint exception entry
> - * [the ARM ARM states that the DFAR is UNKNOWN, but experience shows
> + * [the ARM states that the DFAR is UNKNOWN, but experience shows
This isnt a duplicate is it? It's The ARM Arch. Reference Manual, no?
Same would apply to your other duplicate removals for ARM I guess.
> * that it is set on some implementations].
> */
> if (get_debug_arch() < ARM_DEBUG_ARCH_V7_1)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists