[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220623164032.GA14476@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:40:32 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] MIPS fixes vor v5.19
The following changes since commit a111daf0c53ae91e71fd2bfe7497862d14132e3e:
Linux 5.19-rc3 (2022-06-19 15:06:47 -0500)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mips/linux.git/ tags/mips-fixes_5.19_2
for you to fetch changes up to 3748d2185ac4c2c6f80989672253aad909ecaf95:
mips: lantiq: Add missing of_node_put() in irq.c (2022-06-21 22:34:03 +0200)
----------------------------------------------------------------
- several refcount fixes
- added missing clock for ingenic
- fix wrong irq_err_count for vr41xx
----------------------------------------------------------------
Aidan MacDonald (1):
mips: dts: ingenic: Add TCU clock to x1000/x1830 tcu device node
Liang He (7):
arch: mips: generic: Add missing of_node_put() in board-ranchu.c
mips: mti-malta: Fix refcount leak in malta-time.c
mips: ralink: Fix refcount leak in of.c
mips: lantiq: falcon: Fix refcount leak bug in sysctrl
mips: lantiq: xway: Fix refcount leak bug in sysctrl
mips/pic32/pic32mzda: Fix refcount leak bugs
mips: lantiq: Add missing of_node_put() in irq.c
huhai (1):
MIPS: Remove repetitive increase irq_err_count
arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/x1000.dtsi | 5 +++--
arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/x1830.dtsi | 5 +++--
arch/mips/generic/board-ranchu.c | 1 +
arch/mips/lantiq/falcon/sysctrl.c | 6 ++++++
arch/mips/lantiq/irq.c | 1 +
arch/mips/lantiq/xway/sysctrl.c | 4 ++++
arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-time.c | 2 ++
arch/mips/pic32/pic32mzda/init.c | 7 ++++++-
arch/mips/pic32/pic32mzda/time.c | 3 +++
arch/mips/ralink/of.c | 2 ++
arch/mips/vr41xx/common/icu.c | 2 --
drivers/gpio/gpio-vr41xx.c | 2 --
12 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists